Friday, July 10, 2009

Tour de France: Stage 7


It was an interesting stage today as the Tour had its first mountain stage, in the Pyrenees. As expected Cancellara lost the yellow jersey, and surprisingly, it was a relatively unknown Italian who took it.

Most notably though near the end of the climb that ended the stage, Contador made a break on his own from the leaders and ended up second overall two seconds ahead of Armstrong. According to Armstrong in this video interview, that was not the plan. Astana was supposed to sit with Cadel Evans and others.

Personally, I welcomed seeing Contador getting ahead of Armstrong. The leadership of Astana appears to be in flux. If I were Contador, I would have expected the team to be supporting me going into this tour. However, with Armstrong in the mix and plainly up until today looking for glory himself, there doesn't seem to be any direction on who the leader is. Team director Johan Bruyneel's comments are interesting further down in this article. What they do seems to be up to the racers to plan. Is Bruyneel not going to be a part of any leadership decision making?

Of course, a team could have more than one leader, but I think lends itself to some confusion. Who are the domestiques to support? Both it seems, but that may be alot to ask, and might some domestiques have an allegiance to one leader over the other? Does one leader sometimes support the other and vica versa?

Though as a teammate might be expected to do today, Armstrong did remain with the other leaders and not help out in any chase of Contador.

Well, a couple more mountain stages in the Pyrenees and then plenty more of the Tour to come particularly in the Alps. Glad we've got Saturday and Sunday to watch tomorrow's mountain stages.

Monday, July 6, 2009

Tour de France: Stage 3




The Tour de France is on, and I'd forgotten how much fun it is to follow this race. Fortunately, I have the VS (versus) channel, catching it live in the mornings and replays in the evenings.

Today was a real interesting stage. I've only read about it. Brit Mark Cavendish won his second consecutive stage and at such a young age (24) is confirming his status as the sprinter to beat. Woo hoo! Crikey.

More interesting however was the fact that Lance Armstrong was a part of today's surprise team Columbia-Highroad-led breakaway. Armstrong is a member of team Astana whose leader is ostensibly Alberto Contador. Armstrong is now third overall, and with quotes like these here, you wonder if he's abiding by that leadership designation:


"I am not ok with that theory saying there can be only one team leader," said Armstrong.

"I have won seven Tours de France, I will have to be counted in."

Regarding that first quote, I'd be really surprised if Armstrong was not ok with that theory during his seven-year victory run. Anyway, this sets up for some real intrigue into the dynamics of the Astana team. Are they going to rein Armstrong in? Or are they going to bow to his ambitions and allow both he and Contador to battle for the title? It is impressive that at 37 Armstrong has made such a showing early on. But yes, it is early.

A real interesting post race interview of Armstrong coming up at the right hand side of this page here.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

A Reporter at Large: Brain Gain: newyorker.com

Ok, I finally remembered the last now memorable New Yorker article that I've recently read (maybe I do need a neuro enhancer!). This one is a bit disturbing. It's about the increasing usage of neuro enhancing drugs, something like speed, that allow people to stay awake longer and be more productive. It's one thing to occasionally take these drugs when cramming for exams or meeting work deadlines, but it's another thing when people talk about and businesses plan for the use of neuro enhancers to be a lifestyle choice, and that is what this article examines. Very disturbingly, the author at the end doesn't see a problem with it. Hello??? Long term health effects!!! I certainly hope that these drugs don't become a wave of the future. We'll all regret it.

A Reporter at Large: Brain Gain: newyorker.com

Shared via AddThis

A Reporter at Large: The Sixth Extinction?: newyorker.com

The most significant article that I read recently was by Elizabeth Kolbert. Kolbert has been writing about climate change for the past several years. This article is about the extinction of species, man's likely role in them, and about the disappearance in areas of certain frog and bat species. It is another somewhat depressing but definitely sobering article by Kolbert.

A Reporter at Large: The Sixth Extinction?: newyorker.com

Shared via AddThis

Annals of Business: Not Quite Cricket: newyorker.com

Another good and somewhat entertaining article about the financier (Sir) Allen Stanford who is under federal investigation for defrauding people of billions. A native of Mexia, Texas, Stanford made a name (and a knighthood) for himself on the island of Antigua by establishing himself in the islands banking system and also for being a big promoter of cricket. Tidbits in the of his past indicate that he's not been all he says he's been (e.g. college football player, related to Stanford University's namesake Leland Stanford).

Annals of Business: Not Quite Cricket: newyorker.com

Shared via AddThis

Annals of Law: No More Mr. Nice Guy: newyorker.com

One of some good articles in The New Yorker that I've recently read. This one is about Chief Justice John Roberts being more conservative and combative, particularly about race, than he had appeared during his initial nomination publicity and confirmation hearing. No surprise, duh!

Annals of Law: No More Mr. Nice Guy: newyorker.com

Shared via AddThis

Wall Street and the Third World: vanityfair.com

A good article by Joseph Stiglitz about the damage that has been done by the current economic crisis to the idea of market forces. America has prescribed tough medicine (spending cutbacks, no bailouts) for other parts of the world when they have faced economic crises, but then it does the opposite when facing its own crisis. The ideas of the West in regards to global economics have been under suspicion in the developing world, because the ideas seem to benefit primarily the West and not all the world.

Wall Street and the Third World: vanityfair.com

Shared via AddThis